School leadership can…

…drive innovations in curriculum.

Hello all. Welcome to the 169th edition of TEPS Weekly!

When we speak to school leadership and management about the need for curriculum innovation there are phrases that we hear like improvement plans, teacher training sessions, annual goals and preparing students for the future. But what is curriculum innovation in a real sense? What changes are we looking to make to make the curriculum more ‘innovative’? Is it introducing the project-based learning (PBL) approach? Is it getting students assessed more frequently?

More activities need to be added to the teaching.

More use of technology.

Doing some lessons with the PBL approach.

These efforts may be useful. They may make a classroom more engaging. But they do not automatically make a curriculum more innovative. And crucially, these efforts can be made by teachers at the school. However, the question is, is the school leadership creating the space for teachers to innovate with the curriculum? What are the ways in which a school leader can support innovative approaches to a curriculum?

What makes a curriculum innovative today?

An innovative curriculum which makes students future-ready is not one that is merely defined by the number of digital tools used or the number of projects completed. It is defined by the quality of connections between learning experiences, assessment, technology and learner needs – all culminating in ensuring student learning outcomes. And in today’s age, we don’t want students to merely show evidence of achieving learning outcomes, but we also want them to show their ability to use their learning in any real-world scenario.

A real-world scenario is thought of as a real-world problem that the students can solve. But that’s not always going to be the case – a student in foundational years can apply their knowledge of colour and their skill of sorting to put back all the crayons that the class used in their rightful places. 

A useful way to think about future-ready curriculum innovation is through five connected lenses:

1. Competency-based education

2. Active learning experiences

3. Formative assessments

4. Responsible integration of technology and AI

5. Inclusive and empathy-related education

For example, if a school wants students to become better problem-solvers, the curriculum must clearly identify what problem-solving looks like in that subject. Students then need active learning experiences where they get a chance to think for themselves before teachers ‘give them the answers’. Teachers need formative assessments to check how students are thinking. Technology may support research, feedback or collaboration. The task should also be accessible to different learners and connected to meaningful human or social contexts.

When these elements are disconnected, curriculum innovation becomes superficial. When they are connected, it becomes powerful.

From Content Coverage to Competency Development

Most school planning begins with syllabus, chapters, periods and examination dates. This is understandable. Schools need structure and pacing. But content coverage cannot be the final goal of curriculum design. The goal should be to answer, “What should students be able to do with what they learn?” Answering this question, gets us to start thinking about student competencies.

For example, “complete the chapter on water conservation” is a coverage goal. A competency-oriented goal would be: “Students will be able to analyse causes of water scarcity in their local context and propose practical conservation strategies using evidence.” Here there are skill- and knowledge-based learning outcomes which contribute to students doing something in their local context.

This shifts the thinking. It moves the teachers’ planning from “What should I teach?” to “What should students understand, practise and demonstrate?” It, in turn, helps leaders look at the curriculum more meaningfully and ask questions like “Where are students applying knowledge? What evidence shows that students are improving?” instead of asking whether the portion is complete. 

School leaders play a crucial role in making this shift. Teacher meetings, lesson plan reviews and academic discussions should not only focus on textbook completion. They should also include conversations about learning outcomes, competencies, student thinking and evidence of understanding.

Active Learning Is Not Just Activity

Another common misconception is that active learning means students must always be doing something with their hands like group work, role plays or projects. But they are not examples of active learning. Students can be busy and still not be thinking deeply. They can make a poster without understanding the concept. They can work in groups without discussing ideas. They can use colourful material without making meaningful decisions.

The key question is not only: “What are students doing?” The key question is: “What thinking are students doing?” Active learning involves students in questioning, reasoning, discussing, investigating, creating, solving, applying and reflecting. 

For school leaders, this distinction is important. A classroom may look lively but still be weak in learning. Another classroom may look quiet but contain strong individual thinking, writing or problem-solving. Leaders therefore need to look beyond surface engagement. Useful leadership questions include: Where is student thinking visible? Are students only following instructions, or are they making decisions? Are they only producing something decorative, or are they building understanding?

Formative Assessment as a Curriculum Design Tool

Assessment is often treated as something that happens after teaching. A unit is taught, a test is given, marks are recorded and the class moves on. In this model, assessment mainly judges learning.

In a future-ready curriculum, assessment also improves learning. Formative assessment helps teachers make decisions on what students are understanding, what they are struggling with and what needs to change in instruction. 

At the school leader level, if they only review marksheets, they see learning (or the lack of it) too late. But if they create routines where teachers examine student work and formative evidence, curriculum improvement becomes more immediate and practical. A simple but powerful question for teacher teams is: “What does this student work tell us about the curriculum?”

Responsible Integration of Technology and AI

Technology has become one of the most visible signs of innovation in schools. But technology integration can easily become tool-driven rather than learning-driven. A video shown in class is not automatically better than a teacher's explanation. 

The first question should always be: What learning problem are we trying to solve using technology? For example, AI may help teachers generate examples, create differentiated practice, design discussion prompts or give feedback on drafts. Students may use AI to question, improve, compare or reflect on their work. But there are risks. Technology can distract from learning. AI can hide student thinking. Digital tools can widen gaps if some students have less access or confidence. Teachers may also use AI-generated material without adequate review.

Therefore, school leaders need a pedagogy-first approach to technology. The question is not “Which tool should we use?” but “How will this tool improve learning, assessment, collaboration or inclusion?” A useful question for AI use is: “Does this make learning deeper, or does it hide the learning process?”

Inclusion and Empathy as Curriculum Concerns

A curriculum cannot be called future-ready if it works only for some learners. Innovation must include questions of access, dignity, relevance and empathy. Inclusion should not be added after the lesson is designed but should be a part of curriculum planning from the beginning. Teachers and leaders need to ask: Can different learners access this unit? Are there multiple ways for students to participate and express understanding? Are examples relatable to students’ lives? Does the unit make space for different experiences and perspectives?

When inclusion and empathy are built into the curriculum, learning becomes more meaningful. Students do not only learn concepts; they learn to connect knowledge with human realities.

The 5-Lens Curriculum Innovation Cycle

For schools, curriculum innovation should become a cycle rather than a one-time project and the 5-lens approach mentioned at the beginning can help:

1. Clarify the competencies students should develop.

2. Design active learning experiences that make student thinking visible.

3. Build formative assessment checkpoints into the unit.

4. Integrate technology and AI only where they serve a clear learning purpose.

5. Make the unit inclusive, relevant and empathy-rich.

6. Review evidence from student learning and improve the unit.

The most innovative schools are not schools where every unit is perfect or where individual teachers may innovate within their classrooms, but those where leaders create the systems that help good practices spread. They protect time for collaboration. They ask pointed questions in review meetings. They encourage teachers to look at evidence and modify actions based on the evidence.

---

If you found this newsletter useful, please share it.

If you received this newsletter from someone and you would like to subscribe to us, please click here.

Edition: 5.24